Kalophrynus minusculus

(Figs. 4 – 7, 11 B) Kalophrynus pleurostigma interlineatus: Mertens (1957)

Sumber: Taxonomic assessment of Javanese Kalophrynus Tschudi, 1838, with a description of a new species (Amphibia, Anura, Microhylidae)

Description of topotype (MZB Amph 27229). Adult male (Fig. 4 F – J); small-sized (SVL 26.6 mm); habitus moderately stocky; head broader (HW 8.1 mm, 30.4 % SVL) than long (HL 7.4 mm, 27.9 % SVL); snout slightly rounded in lateral view, protruding beyond lower jaw; eye diameter (ED 3.0 mm, 11.4 % SVL) longer than snout length (SL 2.9 mm, 11.1 % SVL); pupil horizontal; canthus rostralis distinct; loreal region vertical, slightly convex; nostril below canthus, nearer to tip of snout (SNL 0.9 mm, 3.2 % SVL) than to eye (NEL 2.0 mm, 7.5 % SVL); interorbital distance (IOD 3.4 mm, 12.7 % SVL) wider than internarial distance (IND 2.1 mm, 7.9 % SVL), the latter nearly equal to upper eyelid (UEW 2.2 mm, 8.1 % SVL); pineal spot absent; tympanum distinct, roughly rounded, diameter (TD 2.0 mm, 7.6 % SVL) about two-thirds of eye; upper jaw edentate; tongue smooth, without papillae; pair of long smooth vomerine fold, straight-edged flaps behind choanae, each extending from labial edge of mouth to near midline, separated by very short gap from its opposite fold; postorbital low, smooth; buccal fold distinct, higher than postorbital; vocal slit present, on both sides of mouth floor between base of tongue and angle of jaws; median subgular vocal sac. Forelimb slender; finger webbing absent; tips blunt, rounded; finger length formula IV <I <II <III, fourth finger (Fin 4 L 1.8 mm, 6.7 % SVL) slightly shorter than first (Fin 1 L 1.9 mm, 7.0 % SVL); portion of fourth finger projection from palm longer than terminal phalanx of third finger; subarticular tubercles on fingers and palmar tubercles well-developed, rounded, two on fingers I, II, and IV, three on III; outer palmar tubercle large, oval; humeral spine absent; nuptial pad absent. Hindlimb slender, moderately long (HLL 39.5 mm, 148.6 % SVL); toe length formula I <II <V <III <IV; fifth toe projecting as far as third toe; foot (FL 10.1 mm, 38.1 % SVL) shorter than tibia (TBL 10.9 mm, 41.0 % SVL); tibio-tarsal articulation of adpressed limb reaching tympanum; toe tips blunt, rounded; toes webbing poorly developed, webbing formula I 1 – 2 II 1 – 3 III 2 – 4 IV 4 – 2 V; fifth toe projecting as far as the third toe; subarticular tubercles rounded, one on toes I and II, two on III, three on IV, and indistinct on V; inner metatarsal distinct, oval; outer metatarsal present, indistinct. Dorsum skin finely granular, with many small whitish tubercles, scattered on dorsal of head, body, forelimb, and hindlimb; dorsolateral lined with small whitish tubercles, extended from anterior upper eyelid to groin; gland on side of head, behind tympanum, delimited by sinuous groove; supratympanic fold curved; abdomen, ventral thigh, and cloaca with large flattened glandules; pair of round, whitish, slightly elevated tubercles on pectoral region. Coloration. In preservatives, dorsal body dark brownish, with a distinct pair of dark bands from between the eyes to groin; edge of the bands with whitish tubercles; several dark stripes near groin and side of the body; small dots and whitish tubercles formed distinct dorsolateral line from tip of snout to groin, forming boundary between dorsum and side of head and flank; dorsal limbs with dark cross bars; inguinal spot absent; chin with paired, dark, longitudinal bars; pectoral region yellowish, covered with dark dots; abdomen and ventral thigh yellowish. Variation. The morphometric variations are listed in Table 2. Males had smaller than females in SVL, RHL, RHW, RSNL, RToe 4 L, and RToe 5 L. The coloration of paratype specimens varies considerably, ranging from extremely faded dark brown to yellowish brown. A pair of dark bands on the dorsal skin of body were indistinct in three paratypes (MZB Amph 365.3, 371, 376); this might be due to long storage and color change of the specimens. All type and topotype specimens (excluding MZB Amph 27229, 27231) exhibited an inguinal spot without light border; the coloration of the inguinal spot in type specimens was indistinct. Among the topotype specimens, the coloration of the dorsal body ranged from dark brown (MZB Amph 27232, 27233) to light grayish (MZB Amph 27234, 27230) and light brown (MZB Amph 27231). A male paratype from South Lampung (MZB Amph 2339) exhibited a pointed snout in lateral view (Fig. 5 E 3). Morphological comparison. Kalophrynus minusculus differs from K. pleurostigma by females having smaller body size, SVL 29.3 – 32.3 mm (vs. 34.5 – 43.5 mm), thinner dorsolateral line, Fig. 11 B (vs. thicker, Fig. 11 C, D), and fifth toe projecting as far as the third toe in females, Fig. 12 B (vs. fifth toe not projecting as far as third, Fig. 12 C). Kalophrynus minusculus differs from K. meizon by having a smaller body size, SVL 23.1 – 29.2 mm in males, 29.3 – 32.3 mm in females (vs. 37.0 – 50.0 mm in males, 35.0 – 60.0 mm in females), and absence of conical spines on the dorsal skin of the body of males [vs. present: Zug (2015)].